Skip to main content.

Monday, April 16, 2007


The Museum of the Confederacy


I’ll begin by admitting a personal bias. I have a tough time wrapping my head around anything Confederate, including their battle flag, their re-enactors, or their Lost Cause theories. Much as the song “Dixie” can be hauntingly beautiful when performed slowly, I don’t wax nostalgic for the “sacred soil” or the pre-war “sunny South” as depicted in Margaret Mitchell’s “Gone With the Wind.” I do have sympathy for Southern civilians, both white and black, who were caught in the middle, but I do not mourn the loss of its antebellum institutions or its social mores. I don't equate the South’s attempt at secession with the idea of striking a blow for liberty or freedom. That secession was somehow a glorious cause does not compute in my brain when compared to, say, the Irish rebellion, America’s own break from Britain, Haiti’s bloody expulsion of the French, the 1956 Hungarian revolt against the Russians, the 1943 Jewish uprising against the Nazis in Warsaw, or Native American resistance to encroachment on their tribal lands.

The Museum of the Confederacy and the Confederate White House had not been on my radarscope during previous trips to Richmond. Maybe my attitude toward these shrines to the Confederacy was not misplaced. Attendance has been on the decline for years and the M.O.C. has given serious thought to closing its doors or removing to Lexington, Virginia. The State of Virginia recently appropriated $400,000 to the museum, but it remains to be seen if this will save the chronically ailing institution. Here’s an irony, though, which dates to the opening of the M.O.C. A 1936 Richmond Times-Dispatch article, commemorating the 40th anniversary of museum’s opening, noted “that of the average 13,000 visitors annually to the Clay and 12th Street building, a large majority come from north of the Mason and Dixon line… Up from the South--scarcely a twig has been broken or a blade bent in the trek to this greatest of all Southern shines as compared with the flow from Yankee-land.”

Yankees were not the only visitors though. Originally housed in the White House of the Confederacy, cobwebs, dust, mice, and insects were a constant source of irritation and concern during the first 80 years of its existence. The Regents and volunteer staff were famous for their annual spring cleanings, during which time the entire house would undergo a good scrubbing. The museum finally retreated to a new facility, built adjacent to the Confederate White House, in 1976, while the White House itself underwent twelve years of restoration. Today, both buildings appear lost, as they’re surrounded and dwarfed by the Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center complex.

Allowing myself to drop biases and pre-conceived notions I made a visit to the M.O.C. and White House of the Confederacy on March 24th. In all the museum has the world’s largest collection of Confederate artifacts, ranging from decorative art objects, memorial artifacts, regulation and non-regulation flags, swords, firearms, uniforms, military accoutrements, buttons, paintings, sculptures, domestic items, and over 5,000 original images, including 2,500 cartes de viste. The entire collection is obviously not on display, but the first and upper floor had enough on display to satisfy anyone’s curiosity. A current exhibition on the Confederate Navy, including a scale model of the raider Shenandoah, is housed on the lower level. The library, which is not open to the general public, is a repository for 1500 prints, 400 maps, and 10,000 books and bound periodicals. Additional holdings include Lee’s written resignation from the U.S. Army, the Provisional Confederate Constitution, and papers authored by Jefferson Davis.

One case, that was of personal interest, featured the gray suit worn by Davis at the time of his capture at Irwinsville, GA on May 11, 1865. The accompanying text sought to debunk the myth that Davis was wearing “a hoopskirt, sun bonnet, and calico wrapper,” when his party surrendered to members of the Fourth Michigan Cavalry. According to one eyewitness, Davis was, in fact, wearing men’s clothing, and “Mrs. Davis' large waterproof dress or robe, thrown over his own fine gray suit, and a blanket shawl thrown over his head and shoulders.”

After visiting the museum, I reflected on the place it should hold in this modern day world. Based on the values I hold inside today, had I been alive in 1861 I would have been an abolitionist from the start and fought for the Union. But I also realize that had I been born in 1842 in Virginia, or North Carolina, or any of the other nine States that seceded, I might well have accepted the notion of slaves as sub-human, railed against Northern transgressions, and rallied behind the Bonnie Blue flag. And had I survived the war, I would have mourned the gallantry of dead comrades and a shattered landscape. And I would have taken solace in a shrine to our cause and defeat.

It's not for me to say whether the M.O.C. should remain open, close, relocate, or have another museum absorb its vast collection of artifacts. Time and money alone will dictate its fate. But I will say that regardless of what happens, those relics and documents deserve to be preserved. Like it or not, regardless of what the M.O.C. represents to each of us indivually, the entire collection is part of our national heritage. It should speak to us of where we once stood as a nation and, in spite of past sins, how we survived, and how far we have striven to become "one Nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."



null
The Last Meeting of Lee and Jackson







null



null
Suit worn by Jefferson Davis at the time of his capture

null
An unrepentent, still defiant Jefferson Davis in later years




Comments

It would be a good thing if people research our nation's history and learn that the civil war did not start because of slavery. This article starts out with "their battle flag, their re-enactors..". Where is "one Nation" in that attitude? People still have an attitude of us vs. them. The Civil War is part of our nations heritage and we need to know why. Today's re-enactor, on both sides, are teachers. They are spending their time, money and effort to try and teach our nation what the civil war was really about. If you take the Declaration of Independence and where ever there is reference to King George substitute Federal Government you will know why the South fought. They were fighting for their rights, just as Americans have always fought for their rights. They were as passionate as our founding fathers were for their rights, and it was not the right to own slaves.

Posted by S. Thomas at Wednesday, April 18, 2007 08:20:32

S,

In response, I give you the words of Alexander Stephens, Vice President, Confederate States of America, from his "Cornerstone" speech:

Many governments have been founded upon the principle of the subordination and serfdom of certain classes of the same race; such were and are in violation of the laws of nature. Our system commits no such violation of nature’s laws. With us, all of the white race, however high or low, rich or poor, are equal in the eye of the law. Not so with the negro. Subordination is his place. He, by nature, or by the curse against Canaan, is fitted for that condition which he occupies in our system. The architect, in the construction of buildings, lays the foundation with the proper material-the granite; then comes the brick or the marble. The substratum of our society is made of the material fitted by nature for it, and by experience we know that it is best, not only for the superior, but for the inferior race, that it should be so. It is, indeed, in conformity with the ordinance of the Creator.

Posted by Donald Thompson at Wednesday, April 18, 2007 09:23:27

Add Comment